It is God’s will that you should be sanctified . . .
1 Thessalonians 4:3
Do we need a new vocabulary for teaching holiness? This is what I’ve
been hearing for the past few years when the topic of holiness comes up. God has a great many things to say about
holiness throughout scripture. He says four times in Leviticus (11:44,45; 19:2;
20:7), “Be holy, for I am holy.” The
Apostle Peter quotes the Leviticus passages and adds, “But just as he who
called you is holy, so be holy in all you do” (1 Peter 1:15,16). The Apostle Paul makes it clear that this was
God’s plan from the very beginning when he writes “For he chose us in him
before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight . . . to
the praise of his glorious grace” (Ephesians 1:4,6). And Peter again proclaims the privilege of
God’s people of faith. We “may participate in the divine nature” (2 Peter 2:4) which we understand is holy love.
Holiness “to the praise of God’s glory” (Eph. 1:14) is the “not-so-new” normal
throughout scripture.
We understand holiness to be a major,
underlying theme throughout the Scriptures.
William Francis, in his essay “Being Like God . . . Holy,” states “The
Hebrew word for holy (qadesh) and its
derivatives is used more than 700 times in the Old Testament.” Its importance to the Christian life is
easily notable throughout the life and teachings of Jesus, the New Testament
writings of Paul, Peter, James, John, the author of the book of Hebrews, and
the patristic literature of the early church fathers. The history and biblical vocabulary of
holiness is long and established as inspired and gifted by God. But, nevertheless, there is the concern that
the language of holiness is out-of-date and ineffective in communicating the
idea of holiness to present and future generations.
I am strongly inclined to respond with a
sophisticated theological expression: “Baloney!” The idea of an established vocabulary being
outdated is largely bogus. The problem
is not with the long established vocabulary, but with our benign neglect of
teaching holiness using the words, concepts, and ideas that the use of Scripture
and historical writings occasion. If we
look to other areas of knowledge and understanding, we find a richness of
vocabulary with long histories of practical value. These include medicine, engineering,
architecture, information technology, literature, philosophy, business,
economics, psychology, and so on. No one
says, “the vocabulary of medicine, or economics, or engineering is outdated.
Let’s make-up a new one.” I concede that
each area of learning increases in new words and concepts as understanding and
discovery progresses, but that takes place on a preexistent foundation of
learning.
There is a deeper problem. In his letter to the Ephesians (3:18), in
talking about the magnitude (high, wide, long, deep) of God’s love, the Apostle
Paul, in reference to love, suggests that there is “knowledge that surpasses
knowledge.” It is not a cognitive
knowledge of mere intellect. Rather, it
is the deep knowledge of the heart. Whether a new or old vocabulary were used
in the teaching of holiness, the failure of discipleship would be the same if
it did not convey a personal understanding of holiness as a knowledge that
surpasses knowledge, an experiential knowledge of the heart communicated beyond
a particular vocabulary. The essence of
holiness is the essence of God, pure love.
It must be taught with a pure heart and as early as possible in a child’s
life. That topic is worthy of follow-up
postings.
Do we need a new vocabulary? I’d be
grateful to hear what you think!
For God did not call us to be impure, but to live a
holy life.
1 Thessalonians 4:7